Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MEX-418] fix handler for claim multi rewards event on staking contracts #1280

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

claudiulataretu
Copy link
Collaborator

Reasoning

  • staking contracts with boosted rewards now creates the same claim_multi_event

Proposed Changes

  • add check in getSetter from WeeklyRewardsSplittingHandlerService for staking contract and return specific setter service

How to test

  • N/A

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8ae63d7) 56.65% compared to head (4014495) 56.65%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on feat/xexchange-v3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           feat/xexchange-v3    #1280   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              56.65%   56.65%           
==================================================
  Files                    242      242           
  Lines                   8627     8627           
  Branches                 616      616           
==================================================
  Hits                    4888     4888           
  Misses                  3200     3200           
  Partials                 539      539           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 56.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@claudiulataretu claudiulataretu merged commit a20e552 into feat/xexchange-v3 Feb 16, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants